<\/p>\n\n\n\n
I have worked in equalities for over four decades. In the 1970s and 1980s race meant all of us because we considered ourselves Black. When Dummett published her book \u2018A Portrait of English Racism\u2019 or Humphrey and John published \u2018Because they\u2019re Black\u2019 we knew they were talking about all of us. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Later, we came to focus on specific ethnic groups within the \u2018Black\u2019 category such as educational underachievement of Caribbean children (Coard, Rampton). From 1991 onwards we discovered that the Asian achievement had problems within it because Pakistani and Bangladeshis were under-achieving. Slowly, we began to realise that this was not just in education but generally too; these two communities were found to be much more disadvantaged within the Asian category.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
My own work has focused on Black<\/a> (as a political term), Asian<\/a>, White working class<\/a>, the disadvantaged<\/a> and now Pakistani children\u2019s education<\/a> (and the community more generally<\/a>).<\/p>\n\n\n\n We know our communities have differences and similarities in heritage, context and outcome. There are times when the overall category of BAME (like the Black of old) is sufficient as is Asian or ethnic minorities but there are times we need to look at the specific communities (Black, Pakistani, Bangladeshi) and their access to opportunities and power. When doing the latter I often feel a bit of guilt, in case I am seen to have something against the other minority communities which I don\u2019t. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" I have worked in equalities for over four decades. In the 1970s and 1980s race meant all of us because we considered ourselves Black. When Dummett published her book \u2018A Portrait of English Racism\u2019 or Humphrey and John published \u2018Because they\u2019re Black\u2019 we knew they were talking about all of us. Later, we came to … <\/p>\n